What is the difference between the new Samsung GALAXY S4 and the Samsung GALAXY S5. Comparison Samsung Galaxy S6 vs Samsung Galaxy S5 Information about the dimensions and weight of the device, presented in different units of measurement. Materials used, colors offered, certificates
Most recently, Samsung introduced a new smartphone in the S line - Galaxy S5. As expected, the new product was received more than warmly. Of course, there were also negative reviews, for example, many did not like the updated design, but in general, user opinions agree that the smartphone has become an excellent continuation of the popular line.
However, there are still many who believe that the predecessor of this new product, the Galaxy S4 smartphone, is an equally worthy device and remain supporters of this model. To determine which of these two smartphones is more suitable for you, it’s worth understanding what has actually changed.
Specifications
In fact, the differences in technical characteristics are not as significant as it might seem at first glance. The screen diagonal has increased by 0.1. The resolution has not changed: it is still 1080x1920 pixels.
The new device also runs on a 4-core processor, but the clock frequency has increased to 2500 MHz. In addition, the S5 design uses a newer generation processor. The amount of RAM remained unchanged and is still 2048 MB.
To make it easier for you to navigate, we will present you with the main characteristics of both models in the form of a table.
Comparative characteristics
|
Galaxy S4 |
Galaxy S5 |
|
|
Case dimensions (mm) |
136.6 x69.8x7.9 |
142 x72.5 x8.1 |
|
Versions 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
Version 4.4.2 TouchWiz |
|
|
Display diagonal (inches) |
5.1 |
|
|
Display resolution |
||
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon processor version |
Processor 600 APQ8064T |
Processor 801 MSM8974-AC |
|
Number of Cores |
||
|
Frequency (MHz) |
||
|
Graphics chip |
||
|
RAM (MB) |
||
|
Internal memory (GB) |
||
|
Battery (capacity, mAh) |
||
|
Camera resolution (MP) |
||
|
Bluetooth type |
||
What catches your eye is the large battery capacity. Of course, this is a significant “plus” in favor of the S5, because a more powerful battery guarantees longer operating time without recharging.
Other options
The Galaxy S5 includes a lot of nice extra features. One of them is the ability to monitor heart rate, which will be useful for sports and fitness enthusiasts.
In general, the new model leaves a pleasant impression on users and can be considered a successful continuation of the line, but it’s up to you to decide which of these two models you prefer.
Don't know where to buy samsung galaxy s5? Here on the website boommarket.ru you can buy a Samsung galaxy s5 smartphone at a bargain price. I recommend!
One of the main features of Samsung phones has always been the screen size. We've seen the screen trend steadily higher than the 4 inches (10.2 cm) of the original S since 2010, while the iPhone only made the leap to 4 inches in 2012 and has stayed that way ever since.
But in the new Galaxy S5, the screen has increased slightly to 5.1 inches (13 cm) diagonally, compared to 5 inches (12.7 cm) in last year’s model, the Samsung Galaxy S4. Instead of size, Samsung relied on the ability of the new smartphone to adapt its screen to changing external conditions and the ability to dim it.
The Galaxy S5 has a 16 megapixel camera, compared to the 13 megapixels of its predecessor, the Galaxy S4. The camera has fast autofocus and the ability to blur the foreground or background of an image to highlight the main theme of the photo.
Samsung Electronics showed off its new flagship during the Mobile World Congress show in Barcelona, Spain.
The new Galaxy S5 will go on sale worldwide on April 11.The company hasn't announced pricing (it's still a mystery) for the Galaxy S5, but its predecessor retails for around $600.
The S5 has a built-in fingerprint sensor, which is supposed to be used instead of a passcode to unlock the phone or make PayPal payments. This feature is still a rarity in phones, although Apple introduced it last fall with its iPhone 5c.
Samsung's Galaxy S series has emerged as one of the strongest contenders to compete with Apple, and the Korean company is thought to have surpassed Apple as the world's largest smartphone maker. According to Gartner, Samsung smartphones had a global market share of 31 percent last year, compared with 16 percent for Apple iPhones.
Samsung tends to always pack its smartphones with a lot of features and functions, some of which don't work well with each other. The latest smartphones are becoming more intuitive, with larger icons and fewer customization options. Samsung has begun to understand and admit that its devices have become too complex for many people and need to make them more understandable for users.
This time Samsung showed restraint.
"Samsung has focused on user health, fingerprint reading and an autofocus camera while keeping the smartphone's hardware and software very similar in appearance," said Nick Dillon, senior analyst at market research firm Ovum. “The updates are so subtle that at first glance most consumers will have a hard time noticing what has changed from the previous version.”
But he said that was to be expected "given the maturity of the smartphone market and the competitive pressure on Samsung with its winning formula."
The heart rate sensor on the S5 can be used pre- and post-workout to track your fitness activities, but it's not designed for continuous tracking. Samsung also introduced a fitness bundle, a Fit mechanism, and two new types of computerized watches, which will also be available on April 11.
Parents, meanwhile, will have the opportunity to give a smartphone to their child without worrying about him. You just need to set your smartphone to child mode , and only authorized applications will be available to him.Your little one won't be able to email your boss or post an inappropriate picture on Facebook.
The Galaxy S5 smartphone is waterproof and dustproof.
"Our consumers don't want eye-popping technology or the most sophisticated technology," said JK Shin, Samsung's head of information technology and mobile communications. “Our customers want rugged construction and performance. Our consumers want a simple yet powerful camera."
TA-1027
TA-1044
TA-1053
SM-G900F
SM-G900I
SM-G900K
SM-G900L
SM-G900M
SM-G900A
AM-G900T
SM-G900V
SM-G900R4
SM-G900P
Design
Information about the dimensions and weight of the device, presented in different units of measurement. Materials used, colors offered, certificates.
SIM card
The SIM card is used in mobile devices to store data that certifies the authenticity of mobile service subscribers.
Mobile networks
A mobile network is a radio system that allows multiple mobile devices to communicate with each other.
| GSM | GSM 850 MHz GSM 900 MHz GSM 1800 MHz GSM 1900 MHz | GSM 850 MHz GSM 900 MHz GSM 1800 MHz GSM 1900 MHz |
| UMTS | UMTS 850 MHz UMTS 900 MHz UMTS 1900 MHz UMTS 2100 MHz | UMTS 850 MHz UMTS 900 MHz UMTS 1900 MHz UMTS 2100 MHz |
| LTE | LTE 800 MHz LTE 850 MHz LTE 900 MHz LTE 1800 MHz LTE 2100 MHz LTE 2600 MHz LTE-TDD 2300 MHz (B40) LTE-TDD 2600 MHz (B38) LTE 700 MHz (B28) | LTE 800 MHz LTE 850 MHz LTE 900 MHz LTE 1800 MHz LTE 2100 MHz LTE 2600 MHz |
Mobile communication technologies and data transfer speeds
Communication between devices on mobile networks is carried out using technologies that provide different data transfer rates.
Operating system
An operating system is a system software that manages and coordinates the operation of hardware components in a device.
SoC (System on Chip)
A system on a chip (SoC) includes all the most important hardware components of a mobile device on one chip.
| SoC (System on Chip) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC |
| Technological process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Processor (CPU) | 4x 1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53, 4x 1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Krait 400 |
| Processor size | 64 bit | 32 bit |
| Instruction Set Architecture | ARMv8 | ARMv7 |
| Level 0 cache (L0) | - | 4 kB + 4 kB |
| Level 1 cache (L1) | - | 16 kB + 16 kB |
| Level 2 cache (L2) | - | 2048 kB 2 MB |
| Number of processor cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) | Qualcomm Adreno 505 | Qualcomm Adreno 330 |
| Number of GPU cores | - | 4 |
| GPU clock speed | - | 578 MHz |
| Amount of random access memory (RAM) | 2 GB 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Type of random access memory (RAM) | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
| Number of RAM channels | Single channel | Dual channel |
| RAM frequency | 800 MHz | 933 MHz |
Built-in memory
Each mobile device has built-in (non-removable) memory with a fixed capacity.
Screen
The screen of a mobile device is characterized by its technology, resolution, pixel density, diagonal length, color depth, etc.
| Type/technology | IPS | Super AMOLED |
| Diagonal | 5.2in 132.08 mm 13.21 cm | 5.1in 129.54 mm 12.95 cm |
| Width | 2.55in 64.75 mm 6.48 cm | 2.5in 63.51 mm 6.35 cm |
| Height | 4.53in 115.12 mm 11.51 cm | 4.45in 112.9 mm 11.29 cm |
| Aspect Ratio | 1.778:1 16:9 | 1.778:1 16:9 |
| Permission | 720 x 1280 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels |
| Pixel Density | 282 ppi 110ppcm | 432 ppi 169 ppcm |
| Color depth | 24 bit 16777216 flowers | 24 bit 16777216 flowers |
| Screen area | 68.9 % | 69.87 % |
| Other characteristics | Capacitive Multi-touch Scratch resistance | Capacitive Multi-touch Scratch resistance |
| Corning Gorilla Glass 2.5D curved glass screen 500 cd/m² | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
Sensors
Different sensors perform different quantitative measurements and convert physical indicators into signals that a mobile device can recognize.
Rear camera
The main camera of a mobile device is usually located on its back panel and may be combined with one or more secondary cameras.
| Sensor model | - | Samsung S5K2P2XX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | ISOCELL |
| Sensor size | - | 5.95 x 3.35 mm 0.27in |
| Pixel size | 1.12 µm 0.001120 mm | 1.12 µm 0.001120 mm |
| Crop factor | - | 6.34 |
| ISO (light sensitivity) | - | 100 - 2000 |
| Svetlosila | f/2 | f/2.2 |
| Shutter speed (shutter speed) | - | 1/14 - 1/10000 |
| Focal length | 3.67 mm | 4.89 mm 30.99 mm *(35 mm / full frame) |
| Flash type | Double LED | LED |
| Image Resolution | 4160 x 3120 pixels 12.98 MP | 5312 x 2988 pixels 15.87 MP |
| Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 pixels 2.07 MP | 3840 x 2160 pixels 8.29 MP |
| Video recording speed (frame rate) | 30fps | 30fps |
| Characteristics | Autofocus Continuous shooting Digital zoom Geographical tags Panoramic photography HDR shooting Touch Focus Face recognition White Balance Adjustment ISO Setting Exposure compensation Self-timer Scene Selection Mode | Autofocus Continuous shooting Digital zoom Digital image stabilization Geographical tags Panoramic photography HDR shooting Touch Focus Face recognition White Balance Adjustment ISO Setting Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) |
| - | 1080p @ 60 fps Samsung lens |
Front-camera
Smartphones have one or more front cameras of various designs - a pop-up camera, a rotating camera, a cutout or hole in the display, an under-display camera.
Audio
Information about the type of speakers and audio technologies supported by the device.
Radio
The radio of the mobile device is a built-in FM receiver.
WiFi
Wi-Fi is a technology that provides wireless communication for transmitting data over close distances between various devices.
USB
USB (Universal Serial Bus) is an industry standard that allows different electronic devices to exchange data.
HDMI
HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) is a digital audio/video interface that replaces older analog audio/video standards.
Connecting devices
Information about other important connection technologies supported by your device.
Browser
A web browser is a software application for accessing and viewing information on the Internet.
Video file formats/codecs
Mobile devices support different video file formats and codecs, which respectively store and encode/decode digital video data.
Battery
Mobile device batteries differ from each other in their capacity and technology. They provide the electrical charge necessary for their functioning.
| Capacity | 3000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Li-polymer | Li-Ion (Lithium-ion) |
| 2G talk time | 18 h 1080 min 0.8 days | 29 hours 1740 min 1.2 days |
| 2G latency | 768 h 46080 min 32 days | 480 h 28800 min 20 days |
| 3G talk time | 18 h 1080 min 0.8 days | 29 hours 1740 min 1.2 days |
| 3G latency | 768 h 46080 min 32 days | 480 h 28800 min 20 days |
| 4G talk time | - | 29 hours 1740 min 1.2 days |
| 4G latency | - | 480 h 28800 min 20 days |
| Adapter output power | 5 V / 2 A | - |
| Characteristics | Fixed | Wireless charger Removable |
| - | Wireless charging - market dependent |
Test duel Samsung GALAXY S5 vs. Apple iPhone 5s: battle of flagships
The one who came up with something is not always the one who brought it to fruition. Oh, not always.
Device comparison
| Parameter
|
||
| operating system | iOS 7 | Android 4.4 |
| Screen | TFT IPS, 4’’, 640x1136 pixels. | AMOLED, 5.1’’, 1080x1920 pixels. |
| Pixel density per inch (PPI) | 326 | 432 |
| CPU |
2x1300 MHz, ARMv8 64-bit |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC 4x2457 MHz, ARMv7 32-bit |
| GPU | PowerVR G6430 | Adreno 330 |
| SIM card type | nano-SIM | micro-SIM |
| RAM | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Built-in memory | 16/32/64 GB | 16/32 GB (about 5 GB occupied by the system) |
| Memory cards | No | micro-SD (up to 128 GB) |
| WiFi | 802.11 a/b/g/n | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Rear camera | 8 MP, flash, autofocus | 16 MP, flash, autofocus |
| Front-camera | 1.2 MP | 2 MP |
| Additionally | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, LTE |
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, LTE (not available on all models), NFC, IrDA, waterproof IP67, FM |
| Dimensions | 58.6x123.8x7.6 mm | 72.5x142x8.1 mm |
| Weight | 112 g | 145 g |
| Battery | non-removable, 1560 mAh | removable, 2800 mAh |
| Price at time of publication | 28500–38000 rubles | 30,000 rubles |
Source: ZOOM.CNews
In general, there are many different variations of the Samsung GALAXY S5. We took the G900F model, which is equipped with LTE, a Qualcomm processor and 16 GB memory - this is exactly what we tested and it will most likely become the most popular in Russia.
By the way, about LTE. We had the idea of comparing average data transfer speeds over a cellular network under the same conditions, but no matter how many tests we ran, overall the iPhone 5s and GALAXY S5 showed similar results. Is it possible that the reception quality according to the display of the smartphones themselves was still worse for the GALAXY S5.
Appearance, design
Samsung implements many “tricks” only because Apple has them. For example, a fingerprint scanner, which we will talk about below. But sometimes you get the feeling that they put high prices on their products because Apple does so.
But Apple uses high-quality materials (metal, tempered glass), and replaces the smartphone with a new one under warranty, while Samsung uses plastic, which they disguise either as metal or leather. The question arises - why should the new GALAXY S5 cost as much as an iPhone? However, only the most impatient people will pay 30 thousand for a new product from Samsung. If you wait a couple of months, or even a couple of weeks, the price will traditionally drop by 30%.
But imitation of materials is, in our opinion, somehow not serious. A low-slung tinted Nine with a spoiler and vinyl decals is what Samsung's design is all about. Note that this is generally a problem of Korean design - to fake materials and finishing elements. For example, Korean guitar manufacturers like to “draw” fake screws on the body of the instrument (the author judges from personal experience, since he is related to musical creativity). Imagine: a three-dimensional convexity that follows the shape of the screw head, there is even a correct slot, but in fact it is part of the body and such a “screw” cannot be unscrewed.
In general, the iPhone not only looks better (although this is rather a subjective parameter), but also “more honest”. Its body is made of higher quality and more expensive materials, which is already a completely objective fact.
On the other hand, GALAXY S5 has dust and moisture protection according to IP67. What does this mean? In theory, complete protection against dust penetration and protection against short-term immersion in water to a depth of no more than 1 m (at the same time, long-term operation under water, like Sony flagships, is not guaranteed). However, the design of the smartphone case does not look very secure. Two things confuse me: the easy-to-open plug for the micro-USB 3.0 slot and the “unfastening” cover.
Even on the brand new GALAXY S5, the flap opens easily. Too easy.
If you don't close the lid tightly, the phone will drown. Every time you change a SIM card or SD card, you will have to carefully check several times whether all the latches are locked. In practice, users often do not notice that one of the latches is not fixed (not specifically on this smartphone, but in general on all smartphones with a similar cover fastening). Well, there is a possibility that sooner or later the latches will no longer hold the lid securely.
The lid is rubberized, but the “reciprocal” part on the body is somehow not worked out.
In general, it is still not recommended to wash your smartphone under running water, and even more so to swim with it (even in fresh water). As for using a smartphone in the rain, the author of this text was caught in the rain several times with an iPhone 5s, and even talked on it, and the smartphone is alive and well.
So, given the higher quality of materials, the iPhone 5s wins in design.
Ergonomics
Ergonomics, in this case, is how comfortable it is in the hand when used (the last clarification is important - we don’t just need to hold the smartphone, but also press buttons, swipe the screen, etc.). In principle, here both the iPhone and Samsung GALAXY S5 are almost the same, except that because of the large screen, it can be problematic for a Korean to reach the opposite corner of the screen with his thumb.
Yes, we know that some people love it, but the fact is that using the iPhone with one hand is more convenient.
True, it’s easier to press the lock/power button on the GALAXY S5 - it’s on the side.
But speaking of buttons, the iPhone has a silent mode switch. It’s strange that manufacturers didn’t make it a rule to copy this detail: it’s really convenient.
The result? It's a draw - both smartphones have ergonomic advantages and disadvantages in approximately equal amounts.
Screen
It is difficult to objectively compare the screens of different devices. In fact, the only objective parameter for evaluating a screen is the brightness reserve in the sun. Or, more precisely, screen readability in direct sunlight. Everything else: size, resolution, subpixel grid, and even color rendition are perceived subjectively. For example, the author of this text immediately noticed PenTile on the screen of the Samsung GALAXY S5, but it has Full-HD resolution and a very high pixel density. But there are people who are not bothered by PenTile even on low-resolution screens (and did anyone even think: “What is PenTile?”).
Or take the screen size: for someone who has a tablet, it is not so important to have a large screen. It all depends on the scenario for using the phone: if you read a lot on it, watch movies and play games, then yes, you need a big screen. If you communicate on social networks, listen to music, carry your phone in your jeans (of course, “shovels” like the GALAXY Note also fit in a jeans pocket, but this pocket gets wiped out quickly, unless it’s some kind of Levi’s), and you take pictures with a camera, then The size of the screen does not matter, and sometimes even on the contrary, you want a more compact device. That is, with regards to screen sizes, we cannot objectively conclude whether larger is better or worse.
Resolution: The larger the screen size, the higher the resolution should be. Ultimately, the determining factor is not the resolution itself, but the pixel density. While most manufacturers are competing in the megapixel race (screens with 2K resolution have already been announced), Apple continues to use a resolution of 1136x640, which is even less than HD (1280x720) and, even more so, Full-HD (1920x1080). However, what does the user get from enlarging the screen? In theory - a clearer picture, but in practice - the iPhone 5s screen is already quite clear, at a distance of 20 cm from the eyes it is almost impossible to see individual pixels. If you look closely, the screen of the GALAXY S5 will not seem clear enough because of the PenTile (TFT screens with RGB subpixel placement are sharper at the same pixel density). Can we say that the GALAXY S5 screen is better because it has a higher resolution? It’s unlikely - we’re not concerned about the bare numbers, but the result. Of course, if Apple decides to increase the diagonal of the iPhone, it will have to take care of a higher resolution. But for now, 1136x640 pixels is enough.
Color rendering is an objective parameter in itself, but practice shows that ordinary people rather prefer bright, acidic colors than natural shades. This applies not only to smartphones, but also to TVs, photographs, and videos. Notice how much brighter and more contrasting modern films have become compared to the hits of the 80s and 90s.
However, neither the iPhone 5s nor the GALAXY S5 can boast of perfect color reproduction. The iPhone turns slightly red, and the Samsung GALAXY S5 is noticeably blue. Due to the temporary lack of spectrophotometer data, this parameter will also have to be rejected as determining - some will probably like the color rendering of the GALAXY S5 more, others - the iPhone 5s.
In general, instead of “acidic” colors in the GALAXY S5 (as in many other GALAXY smartphones), you can choose more natural colors when setting up screen profiles, but few people bother with this. However, this will not stop the screen from turning blue.
The most natural color reproduction is in the “Standard” mode
As for screen readability in the sun, Samsung is perhaps a little brighter than the iPhone. It’s not that it was impossible to read or watch pictures on an iPhone in direct sunlight, there is enough brightness there, but the Samsung is still brighter. Conventionally, the victory in terms of screen quality can be given to the GALAXY S5.
Functionality
There are no questions here - the Android smartphone wins in absentia. If we compare the set of functions in isolation from the implementation of these functions, the Samsung smartphone is the winner. Of course, the iPhone has several tricks in stock that its competitor does not have (as one example, with the help of third-party applications it can be used as a guitar processor; there are no such applications on Android, and it is far from a fact that they can be made), but In any case, the victory in functionality goes to Android. There’s not even anything to discuss here. Swype, NFC, free file transfer via Bluetooth, the ability to send any files, not just photos, both by mail and in instant messengers, support for SD cards, connecting external storage devices via USB and so on - all this is undreamed of by iPhone and it’s unlikely to even be a dream in the near future.
One of the software guitar processors on the iPhone. Guitarists will appreciate it, others won't care.
Ease of use
We can say that “usability” (ease of use, a copy of usability) is the other side of functionality. Do you know the difference between a geek and a regular user? The geek is interested in the set of functions itself, and he divides technology into “good” and “bad” (or “I’ll buy it!” and “I’ll never do it in my life”) solely by the set of functions.
For a simple user, what is more important is how the functions are implemented. And since the market is focused on users, and not on geeks (there are more users and their ability to pay, oddly enough, is higher), it was the insufficiently convenient implementation that actually “killed” some functions, and even entire groups of devices.
For example, tablets on “desktop” operating systems existed before, but stopped being produced and sold ten years ago due to the fact that they were too inconvenient: with a very inaccurate stylus (it was impossible to operate the screen with your fingers), a weak battery (3 -5 hours of work maximum), heavy, bulky. When the iPad appeared, it was (and remains) much less functional, but it was thanks to its high usability that it not only became very popular, but also gave birth to a whole class of devices - tablets on mobile OS.
Another less obvious example: virtual reality helmets. They were invented back in the 90s and they had similar problems - large weight and dimensions, low resolution, high price. Today, helmets are slowly being revived, but solely because they have become lighter, cheaper and have the resolution of modern TVs (well, almost). And even then, mass demand has not yet been observed, although geeks are delighted. But in any case, the implementation of functionality has seriously improved.
In short, the average user doesn't need a poorly implemented feature. He needs a ready-made device that, out of the box, does what it can do well and without any extra persuasion. In this sense, Apple devices win - with sufficient functionality, they can be quickly learned and easy to use. Perhaps, if we compared the iPhone 5s with some top-end smartphone on Windows Phone, there would be either equality or even victory for Windows Phone (smartphones on this OS are even less functional, but at the same time, simpler).
However, they could easily make a convenient and simple smartphone on Android OS. There are even such, although there are very few of them. Manufacturers themselves overload the interface in pursuit of a large number of functions, which are then used by a negligible percentage of users. GALAXY S5 is an excellent example of this: overloaded menus in which it is difficult to find what you need, a bunch of incomprehensible settings, sometimes exotic, which are “equally” mixed with truly useful ones.
After spending an hour or two on your phone, you will be able to select the ones you need from these shortcuts.
A simple example - we needed to find an LTE switch setting. Which of the Network Connections group shortcuts do you think contains this setting?
Some menu items are present in several groups at once, which greatly increases their already rather large list.
The correct answer is “Other networks”.
Or take the applications. When you launch the GALAXY S5 for the first time, you will find 47 application shortcuts for various applications in the menu. At the same time, among them there is no office suite, social networking clients and games. What are 47 labels for? Obviously, this number is excessive. See for yourself: two browsers (standard and Chrome), two email applications (Gmail and universal), two “Music” applications and another “Play Music”, “Books” and “Play Books”, two “Play Movies” applications (in the name of one of them there is a colon between the words) and another one - “Video”, two photo galleries: “Gallery” and “Photo”, shortcuts “Settings” and “Google Settings” (and also separately - just Google). Why does the user need all this? And most importantly, why do we need two or three applications that perform the same function?
This is all installed in the Samsung GALAXY S5 by default. For what?
If you are an Android connoisseur and don't understand the essence of the problem, put yourself in the shoes of a person who doesn't know how the standard Android browser differs from Google Chrome (given that the former can sync with Chrome data) - how should he feel when he sees all this? on your smartphone?
Of course, Android fans will say that everything can be customized. But think about how logical this sounds: a person who prefers conciseness and simplicity will sit and customize a smartphone for several hours? Is this conciseness and simplicity? Of course no. This person will simply buy another smartphone. For example, iPhone 5s.
Performance
We added the “performance” paragraph only because many readers would probably look for it, and if they didn’t find it, they would write us an angry comment. But, in fact, comparing the performance of the iPhone 5s and GALAXY S5 is pointless. Or, more accurately, aimlessly. Both smartphones cope well with all the most sophisticated games, play Full-HD videos (including from YouTube) and smoothly render interface animations.
In general, even if we found some adequate benchmark (except for the Futuremark graphics test for mobile devices) that would allow us to objectively compare different hardware on different operating systems and bring the results to a common denominator, there would be no sense in this research . This is not a PC, where you can read a review of a new video card (or gaming laptop) and make a conclusion: whether this hardware is enough for you to run the next Crysis or not.
As for the difference in the “bit” of processors (64-bit for the iPhone 5s and 32-bit for the GALAXY S5), the comparison is meaningless here too. For iOS there is a music application called GALAXY Band, which allows you to create 32 music tracks on smartphones/tablets with a 64-bit processor, while on devices with a 32-bit processor you can only create 16 more expensive ones. But there is no such application for Android, and therefore the GALAXY S5 does not lose anything from the fact that it “only” has a 32-bit processor.
Fingerprint sensor
A fingerprint scanner was installed in smartphones even before the iPhone - a well-known fact. For example, in the Toshiba Portege G900. However, the idea did not take root - it was inconvenient to use (remember the discussions above about usability?). Apple decided to rework the idea and came up with an optical sensor that works quickly and to which you just place your finger, rather than moving along the sensor in a certain direction and at a certain speed.
As a rule, what appears in the iPhone will soon appear in other manufacturers. True, HTC managed to do it before Samsung, having built a fingerprint sensor into the HTC One Max. The sensor, however, was an old type, not at all like Apple’s, and was located on the back of the smartphone.
Setting up fingerprints on iPhone 5s
In the GALAXY S5, Samsung placed the sensor in the home button - like the iPhone 5s. True, here the sensor is not optical, and therefore loses to the sensor in the iPhone 5s in all respects:
– in GALAXY S5 you need to move your finger along the sensor (and not very quickly, otherwise it won’t work), but in iPhone 5s you just need to touch it;
– if on the iPhone 5s your finger can be placed in any position, then on the Galaxy S5 - only strictly perpendicular to the bottom edge of the phone;
– in GALAXY S5 you must move the entire pad of your finger over the sensor; if you miss it a little, it won’t work;
When you need to quickly unlock a smartphone, it rarely works the first time
– in the iPhone 5s you can remember up to five fingers, but in the GALAXY S5 - only three (the author of this article would need 4 fingers: two thumbs and two index fingers).
Setting up fingerprints in GALAXY S5
In general, Samsung could, for example, add the ability to set fingerprints to launch certain applications, as HTC did, but, alas, Koreans only spy on Americans. But in vain. It turns out that the fingerprint sensor in the GALAXY S5 is inferior even to that in the HTC One Max, not to mention the iPhone 5s.
Camera
We have written more than once (and clearly demonstrated) that the quality of a camera is not measured by megapixels. Actually, Apple has not increased the number of megapixels in iPhones since the iPhone 4S, but the quality of shooting has increased. For example, photos from the iPhone 5s differ from those from the iPhone 5 with higher sharpness and increased dynamic range.
As for the comparison with the Samsung GALAXY S5, the situation is similar - pictures from the iPhone 5s are sharper, you can see this below (on the left - iPhone 5s, on the right - Samsung). We reduced the size of a 16-megapixel image from the Samsung GALAXY S5 (which should have increased the sharpness of the image compared to a 100% crop) so that the size of objects from the cameras of both smartphones were approximately the same. It is worth noting here that the viewing angle of the Samsung GALAXY S5 camera is narrower (again, this, in theory, should have led to higher sharpness of distant objects) than that of the iPhone 5s. We have highlighted in red those areas that are worth paying attention to.
Left - iPhone 5s, right - GALAXY S5.
As you can see, even despite the lower resolution and wider viewing angle, the 100% crop with the iPhone 5s boasts higher sharpness. In the pictures from the iPhone you can see tree branches even where the Samsung has solid soap.
However, the GALAXY S5 has a wider dynamic range. This can be clearly seen in the following photographs taken in HDR mode (the first photo is from an iPhone, the second is from a Samsung GALAXY S5).
Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.
However, the bad thing is that on the GALAXY S5 the HDR mode must be turned on forcibly, while on the iPhone 5s it works automatically.
The wide dynamic range of the Korean is clearly visible when shooting in the dark:
Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.
On the other hand, the iPhone 5s showed exactly the picture that the user would most likely want to see. It is unlikely that anyone will be interested in color noise in the dark.
A few more pictures:
Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.
Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.
Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.
The color rendition of both cameras is a controversial issue. On the one hand, GALAXY S5 shows a picture closer to reality (although I would like to remove the green tint from the blue sky, there is too much of it), on the other hand, how long have you seen realistic photographs in photo albums? Everyone is into colors now, even professional photographers. Some of them prefer bright, saturated colors, others prefer muted colors, like in old films on film. But both of them do not correspond to what the eye sees.
In general, the GALAXY S5 camera has a lot of settings. And this is rather bad (see the section on “ease of use”). A phone is not a professional camera, here you need to do this: point the lens, press a button, get an excellent (at the maximum capabilities of the smartphone camera) photo.
In our opinion, even the iPhone camera interface is slightly overloaded; they could have made it simpler.
But with the GALAXY S5 everything is much more complicated. Try to guess the first time where to switch the video recording speed, for example?
Well, below you can see the result of that very slow-motion video recording. The top video is from an iPhone, the bottom one is from a Samsung GALAXY S5.
Video from iPhone 5s
Video from GALAXY S5
Here you can notice a few more interesting points. Firstly, both smartphones downgraded video resolution from Full-HD to HD without warning. At the same time, the video from the Galaxy S5 shows that in reality the resolution is even lower (most likely, it is 720i instead of 720p).
Secondly, the GALAXY S5 recorded the video without sound, while the iPhone has sound.
At the same time, in normal mode, the GALAXY S5 can record video in Ultra HD quality, which is not yet available on the iPhone.
Verdict? The iPhone has better sharpness, the GALAXY S5 has more features, and overall the quality is comparable. But since we are talking about the phone’s camera, where a large number of functions only gets in the way, victory for the iPhone 5s.
Autonomy
There is no direct relationship between the frequency of the processor and the performance of the device built on it (let’s once again give an example about the PlayStation 4 with a 1.6 GHz processor and the PlayStation 3 with a 3.2 GHz processor). That is, if you take a specific processor and overclock it in a specific device, then yes, performance will certainly increase, although not linearly. But if we are talking about different processors and different devices running on different operating systems, then you can completely forget about the clock frequency.
Why are we talking about processors in the “autonomy” paragraph? But because, unlike performance, the connection between processor frequency and power consumption is direct. Of course, technology, the instruction set, the number of cores - all this also affects, but, as a rule, the higher the processor clock frequency, the more electricity it “eats”. We specifically emphasize this point to explain why an iPhone with a 1560 mAh battery lasts as long as a Galaxy with a 2800 mAh battery. Of course, with a similar use case.
In terms of autonomy, it's a draw.
Comparison results
The teacher must always surpass the teacher; any champion will be defeated sooner or later. So in technology, any flagship will turn out to be just a “previous model.” But it’s always interesting what new they “stuffed” into the next flagship. Today we will compare the top models Samsung Galaxy S5 and S4.
It’s worth noting right away that the improvements to the predecessor are not revolutionary, but rather a modest evolution. In the end, everyone expected more changes, such as in the case of the Xperia Z1 and Z2 pair, which are almost indistinguishable in design. S5 and S4, on the contrary, are very similar. Let's look at how they differ from each other in design and size.
Differences in the body
- The Galaxy S5 has a more square shape, the corners are not as rounded
- It has a larger screen, by 0.1 inches (more details in the table below), but the display frames are thicker.
- The Galaxy S5 has a different shape for the power button, which includes a fingerprint scanner.
- The speaker grille on the display is no longer chrome-plated, and the entire front end is no longer textured, but a solid gloss.
- The back cover is glossy instead of textured plastic, with round recesses
- The camera protrudes significantly from the surface of the back cover, and the camera glass can be easily scratched.
- A heart rate meter appeared on the rear panel, which is under the camera, next to the LED backlight.
- The microUSB connector is standard 3.0 and has a plastic cap for water resistance.
Hardware changes
There have also been some changes under the hood, see the table below for more details. An improved chipset, increased camera resolution, the smartphone received a heart rate meter and a fingerprint reader. The battery capacity has also increased, but the battery life is subjectively the same, maybe even worse. Big changes are in the new user interface, which now has cleaner and simpler graphics. An extreme energy saving mode has also been added, on the other hand, some gestures have disappeared.
| Characteristic | Samsung Galaxy S5 | Samsung Galaxy S4 |
| Dimensions | 142.0 ? 72.5? 8.1 mm | 136.6? 69.8? 7.9 mm |
| Weight | 145 g | 130 g |
| Screen diagonal | 5.1" | 4.99 " |
| Display resolution | 1920 x 1080 pixels (432 ppi) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (441 ppi) |
| Ratio Screen area/front area |
69.64% | 71.99% |
| Battery capacity | 2800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 |
| Clock frequency | 4 x 2.5 GHz | 4 x 1.9 GHz |
| Graphic cards | Adreno 330 | Adreno 320 |
| RAM memory | 2 gigabytes | 2 gigabytes |
| Camera | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Front camera | 2 megapixel | 2 megapixel |
| Camcorder | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
| Waterproof case | Yes (IP67) | No |
| Starting sale | Apr. 14 | Apr.13 |
Update or not?
Samsung Galaxy S5 is a rather modest evolution, and even if there are several interesting innovations, such as: a waterproof body, a fingerprint scanner, a heart rate monitor, a camera with a higher resolution. We don’t see anything from this that makes it worth throwing out your Galaxy S4 and running to the store for a new product. If, of course, you have to choose between S4 and S5, and finances allow it, of course it is better to take a new product, just for the sake of the fact that it is new. The Galaxy S4 has a similar display, battery, camera and all the features, and we can expect the Galaxy S4 to also receive an operating system update at a later date. Moreover, it is several thousand cheaper. So if you're looking for a top-of-the-line phone with a large FullHD display, you don't necessarily have to splurge on the S5; the Galaxy S4 is a good choice that most, even the most picky users, will be perfectly happy with.